You can't trust and don't need to look at (utterly meaningless!!!) GeekBench (or other synthetic system benchmarking) scores BTW. Performance will be almost identical until you have 2 or more apps actually doing something and then the 8 core will take the lead and a huge lead too. I'm hoping to sell my 2.8ghz 8-core for the same price I can buy a used 2.66ghz 4-core (which is likely the only Mac Pro 4,1 in that price range) but only if it's better of course! I'm also planning to use Adobe Premiere and maybe After Effects in the future. I will be running a lot of Photoshop, Final Cut Studio, and I tend to run a lot of these things simultaneously. So I need you guys to provide a third (or more) opinion perhaps with your own real world findings. It was also 27 percent faster in our Photoshop tests, and 20 percent faster at Compressor than the older system. This page says "The new quad-core's score in our overall system performance suite, Speedmark 5, was 16 percent faster than that of the previous 2.8 GHz eight-core Mac Pro. This page says the 2008 8-core (2.8ghz) is faster with a benchmark speed of 9231 vs. I've had two sources of different information about which machine has the speed advantage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |